Lax Enforcement
In a California Public Interest Research Group (CalPIRG) study of state
records, of nearly 6,800 reported violations fewer than 4 percent received any
enforcement action from the state and fewer than 1 percent resulted in fines
for violators.
The CalPIRG report summarized its findings: Due to a combination of
weak tools, under-staffing of law enforcement agencies and a lax attitude among
some officials, it is evident that enforcement of the Clean Water Act through
fines and other penalties has never been a threat for many industries.
The State Water Resources Board responded to the CalPIRG report that its
enforcement efforts have improved recently with new personnel positions added
in the enforcement area; that in the past 2 years enforcement actions have
increased by 50 percent.
While that expanded level of response would include fewer than 6 percent of
violations, it is a clear indication that pressure from the EPA and
othersplus the states own lawsignal a change.
New efforts in Sacramento to adequately fund pollution monitoring promise
stronger policing. The funding for state inspectors and other frontline
regulators had been allowed to shrink over past years. There is now support in
the state legislature and governors office to restore funding and
increase pressure on all polluters.
The Law
Since 1992 builders on all sites with more than 5 acres of disturbed
landand certain smaller siteshave been required to file notice with
the SWRCB. They must reveal their intentions and join in the General
Construction Activity Storm Water Permit. Further, a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be prepared outlining stormwater pollution
prevention measures or best management practices (BMPs) to reduce contaminated
runoff.
According the guidebook on erosion and sediment controls published by the
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board:
Construction-related erosion and sedimentation can cause problems for
downgradient property owners, create nuisance problems on adjacent streets,
clog streams and storm drains, and lead to premature silting up of reservoirs.
The cumulative toll on the environment can be devastating. Uncontrolled erosion
is costly, violates state and federal pollution laws, exposes developers,
contractors, and landowners to legal liabilities, and provides ammunition to
those who argue that the development process itself is out of control.
As more and more development in the Californias revitalized economy
takes place, the threat from erosion is increasing.
What is Runoff Worth?
Violators face civil penalties of up to $10,000 a day plus $10 per gallon of
sediment-laden runoff. The Superior Court can impose fines of up to $25,000 per
day. A knowingly false statement can get the violator as much as a $10,000 fine
and 2 years prison time.
In the face of such regulatory pressure and lawsuits against violators, the
best course is the far less expensive alternative of complianceof erosion
prevention and mitigation.
More information on how to comply is available from the State Water
Resources Control Board web site http://www.swrcb.ca.gov; or
http://www.stormwater-resources.com,
or from your regional water quality control board. Check your phone directory
state government pages under water quality.
Then talk to the erosion control experts at
Albright Seed Company for practical,
cost-effective pollution solutions and products that work.
|